Publius pro tem
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2007
- Messages
- 12,488
- Reaction score
- 14,999
I was going through some of the obscure and oddball stuff in my music collection.
Stumbled across Van Halen III.
Hadn't listened to the entire album since, well... the late nineties.
I remember buying it just because.
Listened through it a couple of times on a road trip, and it was summarily filed away to collect dust.
Playing it again (twice) the other day made me realize that the album EVERYBODY would like to forget sucks.
After all these years, I wondered if my original assessment would change - and it did not.
Let me clarify something here before I go too far - I was never really a HUGE Van Halen fan to begin with.
Oh, I remember when the first album came out.
Stood the rock n roll world on its head.
There is no denying that Eddie was the Hendrix of the late seventies.
But David Lee Roth was (and always will be) an insufferable buffoon.
Great front man? Absolutely.
Good singer? Sure.
Helped complete the Van Halen package and attract a massive audience?
Right on.
But what a motor-mouthed, self-aggrandizing, semi-talented asshole.
Crazy from the heat, indeed.
Eddie's over-the-top guitar gymnastics were technically dazzling, but never really moved me.
Van Halen was the band that was everywhere on the radio and I heard more than I really wanted to.
Then the news came out, after months and months of bickering that made for countless magazine articles:
DLR is out of Van Halen, for now and forever.
Sammy Hagar was next in line, which I anticipated with a zeal I have rarely felt about the music world.
Hey, I was a HUGE Sammy Hagar fan - Montrose, HSAS, anything he worked in.
Pretty decent guitar player, rockin' songsmith, great vocalist, and damned good showman.
Guitar-wise, I would take the simple but effective riffs over the fretboard gymnastics of EVH any day.
When I heard that the two of them were working on an album together - WOW!
Sammy's riffs and vocals, with Van Halen and all his wizardry, this was my idea of a supergroup.
Maybe I could finally learn to really LOVE Van Halen.
The brief TV broadcast of the appearance they made at Farm Aid '85 whetted my appetite.
When I saw that footage of them playing a Led Zep tune because they hadn't worked up any material yet?
Hell, that works for me!

Okay, so the Van Halen fans were mostly disappointed with the results.
As a Hagar fan, I was quick to point out MY disappointment too - Sammy wasn't playing guitar!
Why was a player like Hagar relegated to mouthpiece duties alone?
Saw 'em live a coupla times, in what would turn out to be my last stadium/enormo-dome shows.
They got worse every time.
The last show was not much more than an hour - including the encore.
They even did a medley of a few songs all crammed together - WTF?
It was like they couldn't wait to get off stage and go something that really mattered to them.
Then Sammy was finally out, and his Marching To Mars tour was a show to catch.
Over 3 hours, serious rock n roll, and plenty of stage banter about EVH - mostly positive and all humorous.
Probably one of the best concerts I ever attended.
Sammy mentioned (or hinted) how his days went touring with VH:
Plush travel - separately
Sound checks that were a mere formality
Kill some time until the show
Do a quick run-through a few songs
Hop in the limousines before anyone realized the show was over
Off to the hotel to party
He made a pretty convincing argument that Van Halen had "made it" and were content to just ride the train now.
So what was Van Halen to do?
They were obviously (to me, anyhow) way behind the curve on a Plan B.
Maybe they were creatively spent.
Maybe the drugs had finally snuffed out whatever creativity might remain.
Maybe they were simply tired of the biz and wanted to just chill out for awhile.
(Fans don't like it, but they are damned sure entitled to do so.)
Then Gary Cherone from Extreme was finally disclosed to be the new front guy, after months and months of rumors.
Were they ALL rumors?
So the album finally comes out and I hear the radio DJ music "experts" pronounce it as disappointing.
I was on a road trip, and not having much luck with FM rock stations, so I bought the disc.
Two of my observations from back then come to mind:
1. Cherone was a great vocal replacement for Sammy Hagar's parts.
2. The album was loaded with cheesy sound effects and less-than-impressive songs.
Okay, so I played it through a few more times and tried to be objective.
I simply could not find any bright spots outside of a few cool trademark EVH riffs.
Now, fast-forward to 2015 and a few more listens.
You know what?
Van Halen III really does suck. But is it Gary Cherone's fault?
How much did Cherone contribute to the songwriting?
Does he even play guitar - at least any better than David Lee Roth?
How about all the oddball sound effects and production gloss?
As slick as they were, even Extreme wasn't that bad.
Eddie's guitar playing on VH III was serviceable, but certainly not extraordinary.
At least there weren't the goofy-ass "Jump" carnival-esque keyboard parts.
(I will NEVER forgive Eddie for THAT sh!t...)
On VH III, I noticed Eddie's tone seemed really neck-pickup Strat-ish in a few places.
He did some cool stuff here and there.
But I simply could not get into ANYTHING they did on that album.
But I have to ask again - was it the fault of Gary Cherone?
You know, the guy IS pretty damned talented from all indications I have seen.
And now the very mention of his name is a punchline.
History has not been kind.
Gary, wherever you are man - my hat is off to you.
Stumbled across Van Halen III.
Hadn't listened to the entire album since, well... the late nineties.
I remember buying it just because.
Listened through it a couple of times on a road trip, and it was summarily filed away to collect dust.
Playing it again (twice) the other day made me realize that the album EVERYBODY would like to forget sucks.
After all these years, I wondered if my original assessment would change - and it did not.
Let me clarify something here before I go too far - I was never really a HUGE Van Halen fan to begin with.
Oh, I remember when the first album came out.
Stood the rock n roll world on its head.
There is no denying that Eddie was the Hendrix of the late seventies.
But David Lee Roth was (and always will be) an insufferable buffoon.
Great front man? Absolutely.
Good singer? Sure.
Helped complete the Van Halen package and attract a massive audience?
Right on.
But what a motor-mouthed, self-aggrandizing, semi-talented asshole.
Crazy from the heat, indeed.
Eddie's over-the-top guitar gymnastics were technically dazzling, but never really moved me.
Van Halen was the band that was everywhere on the radio and I heard more than I really wanted to.
Then the news came out, after months and months of bickering that made for countless magazine articles:
DLR is out of Van Halen, for now and forever.
Sammy Hagar was next in line, which I anticipated with a zeal I have rarely felt about the music world.
Hey, I was a HUGE Sammy Hagar fan - Montrose, HSAS, anything he worked in.
Pretty decent guitar player, rockin' songsmith, great vocalist, and damned good showman.
Guitar-wise, I would take the simple but effective riffs over the fretboard gymnastics of EVH any day.
When I heard that the two of them were working on an album together - WOW!
Sammy's riffs and vocals, with Van Halen and all his wizardry, this was my idea of a supergroup.
Maybe I could finally learn to really LOVE Van Halen.
The brief TV broadcast of the appearance they made at Farm Aid '85 whetted my appetite.
When I saw that footage of them playing a Led Zep tune because they hadn't worked up any material yet?
Hell, that works for me!





Okay, so the Van Halen fans were mostly disappointed with the results.
As a Hagar fan, I was quick to point out MY disappointment too - Sammy wasn't playing guitar!
Why was a player like Hagar relegated to mouthpiece duties alone?
Saw 'em live a coupla times, in what would turn out to be my last stadium/enormo-dome shows.
They got worse every time.
The last show was not much more than an hour - including the encore.
They even did a medley of a few songs all crammed together - WTF?

It was like they couldn't wait to get off stage and go something that really mattered to them.

Then Sammy was finally out, and his Marching To Mars tour was a show to catch.
Over 3 hours, serious rock n roll, and plenty of stage banter about EVH - mostly positive and all humorous.
Probably one of the best concerts I ever attended.
Sammy mentioned (or hinted) how his days went touring with VH:
Plush travel - separately
Sound checks that were a mere formality
Kill some time until the show
Do a quick run-through a few songs
Hop in the limousines before anyone realized the show was over
Off to the hotel to party
He made a pretty convincing argument that Van Halen had "made it" and were content to just ride the train now.
So what was Van Halen to do?
They were obviously (to me, anyhow) way behind the curve on a Plan B.
Maybe they were creatively spent.
Maybe the drugs had finally snuffed out whatever creativity might remain.
Maybe they were simply tired of the biz and wanted to just chill out for awhile.
(Fans don't like it, but they are damned sure entitled to do so.)
Then Gary Cherone from Extreme was finally disclosed to be the new front guy, after months and months of rumors.
Were they ALL rumors?

So the album finally comes out and I hear the radio DJ music "experts" pronounce it as disappointing.
I was on a road trip, and not having much luck with FM rock stations, so I bought the disc.
Two of my observations from back then come to mind:
1. Cherone was a great vocal replacement for Sammy Hagar's parts.
2. The album was loaded with cheesy sound effects and less-than-impressive songs.
Okay, so I played it through a few more times and tried to be objective.
I simply could not find any bright spots outside of a few cool trademark EVH riffs.
Now, fast-forward to 2015 and a few more listens.
You know what?
Van Halen III really does suck. But is it Gary Cherone's fault?
How much did Cherone contribute to the songwriting?
Does he even play guitar - at least any better than David Lee Roth?
How about all the oddball sound effects and production gloss?
As slick as they were, even Extreme wasn't that bad.
Eddie's guitar playing on VH III was serviceable, but certainly not extraordinary.
At least there weren't the goofy-ass "Jump" carnival-esque keyboard parts.
(I will NEVER forgive Eddie for THAT sh!t...)
On VH III, I noticed Eddie's tone seemed really neck-pickup Strat-ish in a few places.
He did some cool stuff here and there.
But I simply could not get into ANYTHING they did on that album.
But I have to ask again - was it the fault of Gary Cherone?
You know, the guy IS pretty damned talented from all indications I have seen.
And now the very mention of his name is a punchline.
History has not been kind.
Gary, wherever you are man - my hat is off to you.

.